IC prospective

[dearmesemtex]

Character: Jim Moriarty
Mun: Eri
Plot specific: N

Bending myself to technical matters, I have contrived a revolutionary spell which is based on high-frequency sound waves. Extremely effective in the short range in initial tests, it unfortunately consumes quite a high level of power. I envisage it will be of great use once better refined, being easily activated and capable of causing a great deal of damage, including the temporary deafening of guard dogs. Has demonstrated a curious side effect; spell seems to have the ability to melt any chocolates within 100 paces whilst leaving other objects - glass, cabinetry, structures of any sort - intact. Cannot forsee a use, but will nonetheless log in the report. May need to defer to someone more knowledgeable in the use of sound waves.

Comments

[dearmesemtex]

Yes, of course. And if trial and error is necessary for progress, then we have a certain... obligation... to ensure the trial (and subsequent error) is not... well, us. Correct? [Logically, yes. Fishing now, to see how easily manipulated Billy is, and where his moral compass points.]

You said yourself you were lucky. So you narrowly avoided being an error. How fortunate.

[status_is_not_quo]

Ordinarily and theoretically I would agree, but it's more complicated than that. Personally, I'll exhaust every last avenue of research and theory before I take it to a human subject. If there's no immediate reason for haste, I don't see the point in jumping right to human experimentation.

_{[Some hesitation dots here, as he tries to read what exactly Jim's trying to get out of him with that last remark.]}

I like to think so.

[dearmesemtex]

How so? [Oh, so he is a moral one. Inconvenient, etc.] You make it unnecessarily complicated. Why not cut out the process? Get on to bigger and better things?

Besides, wouldn't you be making a trial for those healers to improve as well?

Not that it has any effect on me what you do, when it comes down to it.

[status_is_not_quo]

But where's the science in just jumping to the end result? Even some of humanity's greatest scientific monsters (and scientific geniuses) at least did some testing and research before moving on to actual test subjects. It's called the Scientific Process, not the Scientific Circus Act. I'm not about to make an ass of myself by going off half-cocked on the first half-formed hypothesis that jumps into my head.

Besides, my projects are big enough. Too big, if the Ministry is to be believed.

[dearmesemtex]

Suppose that's one way of doing things. I prefer working it all out in advance before jumping in to test. Then note, refine, test again. Rely on it working the first time off-paper in some cases. The theory is that you do not act on half-formed hypotheses, but on fully-formed and developed ideas.

I will not stop you from going the long way, if that is your prefrence, though. [Just don't be angry if he beats you to the punch, if you have a notion he likes.]

Then damn the ministry.

[status_is_not_quo]

_{[Yeah, like hell you're actually going to get anything about his experiments from him. Even his roommate doesn't know what he's working on.]}

I always do, Jim.

[dearmesemtex]

[Was worth a shot - a shot which will continue to be taken at any offered oppurtunity, but not one that will be sought out; its not that important, after all.]

Good for you.