c9rp9realn9rmative: (N9 see y9u are so wrong)
Kankri Vantas ([personal profile] c9rp9realn9rmative) wrote in [community profile] dressrobes 2012-09-01 06:54 pm (UTC)

#tw: trigger warning #69th as in that's what it means #and I'm warning f9r it

Partly. Alth9ugh many can attest that my handwriting was n9t much 6etter when I was living.

Yes. Dead is an 9ffensive term am9ng the m9re recently disc9rp9rated. Living-impaired, h9wever, has begun t9 be used t9 refer t9 inferi as well, s9 the anat9mically disp9ssessed c9mmunity is t9rn whether we sh9uld stand 9ur gr9und 9r just a6and9n the phrase alt9gether. I am pers9nally 9n the fence a69ut it. Given that inferi d9n't even have sentience t9 be 9ffended 9r triggered 6y inappr9priate termin9l9gy, and that they als9 already have 'Differently-resurrected', I can see why s9me m9re stu669rn pr9p9nents might think they sh9uld step 9ff. 9n the 9ther hand, even with9ut the term living-impaired, we still have afterlife-challenged, anat9mically disp9ssessed, c9rp9really limited, and transc9rp9real. H9wever, it is really up t9 the individual t9 decide what they identify as and t9 inf9rm th9se they have regular dealings with acc9rdingly.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting